The Introduction and Chapter one provided interesting background and theory on visual communication. One thing I noticed was that the authors would make statements that would make strong assertions but then never explain or go in depth about them. I am interested to see if the book continues this or explains those assertions.
So this blog post consists of some the assertions and my thoughts on them.
- "Not being 'visually literate' will begin to attract social sanctions" (3). -What do they mean by 'social sanctions?'
- 'Visual literacy' will begin to be a matter of survival, especially in the workplace" (3). - What is this based one? I want to read more about this but this sentence comes at the end of the paragraph.
- "Within Western visual design, however, we believe that our theory applies to all forms of visual communication" (4). - this seems very generalized and it sounds like they found a culture to fit their theory instead of vice versa.
- "Perspective is unique to images" (19)-- Why is it unique? I would like a little more explanation.
- "Language in its spoken form is a natural phenomenon, common to all human groups" (21).- This is a poor word choice. A phenomenon and common? I understand what they are saying but a different word like - occurrence would have conveyed the message better.
0 comments:
Post a Comment